Stock markets face worst nightmare as EU ticker tape gains support – POLITICO

Throughout Europe, inventory markets’ greatest fears might come true as an bold plan for a ticker tape gathers momentum in Brussels.

Inventory exchanges are fiercely resisting requires a “consolidated tape” that may create one supply of costs for buying and selling throughout the EU’s numerous buying and selling venues. They concern the tape may eat up profitable buying and selling knowledge income, presumably even pushing smaller exchanges out of enterprise.

That is an existential query for exchanges, each large and small, as a result of they make a lot of their cash promoting knowledge.

The exchanges say they’ve a greater thought – a “post-trade” inventory tape the place value info is launched with a 15-minute delay – whereas pushing exhausting in opposition to longer variations.

Nonetheless, these arguments might now be failing. Each EU capitals and now the lead MEP engaged on the laws are discussing a real-time tape with a minimum of some pre-deal info on affords and calls for earlier than a deal takes place. Polish MEP Danuta Hubner He says the tape would solely be priceless to traders if it included pre-trade knowledge, in line with an explanatory notice not too long ago seen by POLITICO.

Consequently, “it’s important that the inventory tape include real-time pre-trade info vital to tell traders’ buying and selling selections,” says the notice, which gives an outline of Hübner. draft report.

Exchanges and different buying and selling venues face necessary submissions to tape in trade for a portion of the income generated from investor subscriptions.

Hübner’s plans would nonetheless supply some reduction to smaller inventory exchanges, which might be exempt from such filings below sure situations. Nonetheless, they may additionally select to take part and get a better share of the income.

In the meantime, EU capitals are reviewing a proposal proposed by the French Presidency of the Council in June that may additionally embody pre-negotiation voluntary contributions.

Pre-trade inclusion is a large blow to bigger exchanges, resembling Deutsche Börse and Euronext, the place such knowledge kinds a bigger a part of their income. The best way they see it, a consolidated tape amassing pre-trade knowledge would harm their enterprise fashions.

It additionally goes past the European Fee’s preliminary proposals for a inventory tape with post-trade info as near real-time as doable amid considerations there might not be sufficient buying and selling demand.

“We’ll proceed to advocate for a package deal of market construction measures that reinforce transparency, along with a well-calibrated technique [tape]”mentioned a spokesman for the Federation of European Inventory Exchanges (FESE), the principle business physique. “However not one which releases pre-trade knowledge, creating an illusory view of the market, ripe for arbitrage by main institutional gamers to the detriment of retail traders”.

political minefield

The battle over the tape has turn out to be one of many trickier points in monetary providers coverage. The laws has turn out to be a political minefield in Brussels, as nationwide pursuits mix forces with competing business lobbyists to create political blocs.

Germany and a bunch of Central and Japanese European international locations assist trade lobbying attributable to fears concerning the tape’s influence on their nationwide exchanges, which might be vitally essential to native economies.

Then again, there are international locations just like the Netherlands and Eire, which assist an bold duct tape on the grounds that it’ll enhance transparency in disparate markets and assist the EU obtain considered one of its major political objectives: a capital markets union. the place funding flows freely throughout borders. .

However it isn’t so simple as being for and in opposition to. The talk can also be sophisticated by one other bitter battle between exchanges and funding banks over how a lot buying and selling ought to be performed in “gentle” or “darkish” markets. (“Lit” refers to buying and selling performed within the open and on exchanges, whereas “darkish” trades are performed confidentially, in non-public “darkish swimming pools” or facilitated by funding banks.)

exchanges typically to oppose to the expansion of darkish buying and selling on the grounds that it ought to solely be accessible for giant block trades that would transfer the market. The business foyer desires the EU to power a number of the transactions that funding banks do internally with purchasers to return to public markets.

“Whereas we agree with the necessity to handle liquidity fragmentation, tape is just not the answer,” the FESE spokesperson mentioned. “Solely a correct market construction can handle fragmentation. In truth, the difficulty is to what extent banks can internalize buying and selling on their very own books.”

In the meantime, funding banks argue that the EU wants quite a lot of buying and selling venues and warn in opposition to imposing “undue restrictions” that would harm liquidity and restrict traders’ choices.

“Banks, as market makers, are a vital a part of this ecosystem, committing their stability sheets to supply liquidity to monetary markets,” mentioned Adam Farkas, chief government of the Affiliation of Monetary Markets in Europe (AFME). “This brokerage is important to assist assist market depth and liquidity all through altering market situations.”

Hübner tries to strike a stability in his draft report. In a concession to exchanges, he proposes to create extra transparency earlier than trades are made by elevating the edge for using value exemptions and limiting the flexibility of funding banks to cite beneath that degree for their very own inner buying and selling techniques. negotiation. However he would additionally take away present limits on darkish buying and selling, which he describes as “restricted utility,” a transfer favored by funding banks.

successful some victories

Hübner’s compromise on darkish buying and selling is just not the one instance the place exchanges have been in a position to maintain their floor. They could additionally come out forward in a battle over “pay per order circulation” (PFOF), an innovation that permits on-line functions to supply retail traders a commission-free service whereas incomes cash by directing their inventory orders to brokers. chosen.

Exchanges have been backing a Fee proposal to ban PFOF altogether, which can once more drive buying and selling away from public markets. Brussels had launched the prohibition inside capital markets reforms attributable to considerations about conflicts of curiosity after the observe got here below scrutiny throughout the GameStop commerce frenzy within the US.

Amongst EU capitals, Germany, residence to lots of the fintech platforms utilizing PFOF, has been adamant in its opposition to the ban. However now it finds itself more and more remoted as different international locations again the ban.

Initially, the French presidency tried to maintain everybody completely satisfied get marry continued use of PFOF with a pre-trade tape to check the worth the mannequin gives to traders, however there was opposition from each side and the proposal shortly died.

For his half, Hübner retains the ban on the desk. So whereas exchanges watch the momentum behind a extra bold tape, they will not lose solely if extra trades are delivered to gentle once more.

This text is a part of POLITICIAN Professional

The excellent answer for political professionals that fuses the depth of POLITICO journalism with the ability of expertise

Unique and final minute info and scoops

Customized Coverage Intelligence Platform

A high-level public affairs community